« Oh No, I've Said Too Much. | Main | Ukraine Update. »

March 19, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455aa0369e200d8347d869669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Terri Schiavo.:

Comments

Craig

You say: Terri is not being kept alive and anyone who says so doesn't know what they are talking about. Terri is being kept alive like I am.

My response: I'm glad that you're doing so well considering that you are on a feeding tube.

best wishes,

CZ

Daniel

You ignore my next sentence. Keeping me - or you - from sustenance would be deemed murder. Except for a woman who can't protect herself.

Maggie

John "Johnny" Evander Couey. CONVICTED sex predator, alleged murderer of little Jesse Lungren (depending on if you accept his confession). ON SUICIDE WATCH.

Terri Schiavo. INNOCENT. Possibly in a vegetative state (depending on who you talk to). FEEDING TUBE REMOVED.

Can't I vote on this???? Something seems FUBAR.


Maggie

Jessica LUNSFORD....I have friends named Lungren so the name slipped.

akaky

"I'm glad that you're doing so well considering that you are on a feeding tube."

I'm sorry, I must have missed something along the way; when did being on a feeding tube become a capital crime in Florida?

jaed

The tube doesn't matter all that much (except as a sop to the conscience), since a) Terri Schiavo has never received therapy that might well enable her to eat and drink normally, and b) in any case she is also under a court order forbidding attempts to feed her by mouth during the starvation process; whether she actually *needs* to be fed via tube is not relevant, it seems.

But. Even if it turns out that she isn't able to eat normally, since when does severe disability = a death sentence? Did she stop having rights - the right to due process, the right to legal existence independent of her husband, the right to not be tortured - when her brain was damaged?

jaed

The tube doesn't matter all that much (except as a sop to the conscience), since a) Terri Schiavo has never received therapy that might well enable her to eat and drink normally, and b) in any case she is also under a court order forbidding attempts to feed her by mouth during the starvation process; whether she actually *needs* to be fed via tube is not relevant, it seems.

But. Even if it turns out that she isn't able to eat normally, since when does severe disability = a death sentence? Did she stop having rights - the right to due process, the right to legal existence independent of her husband, the right to not be tortured - when her brain was damaged?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search

November 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Blog powered by TypePad

Copyright


  • Creative Commons License